Safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in solid-organ transplant candidates: a systematic review

Wallen, Matthew, Skinner, Tina, , Hall, Adrian, MacDonald, Graeme, & Coombes, Jeff (2016) Safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in solid-organ transplant candidates: a systematic review. Transplantation Reviews, 30(4), pp. 218-226.

View at publisher

Description

Background - Patients awaiting solid-organ transplantation may be encouraged to undertake exercise training to improve pre- and post-transplant outcomes. However, the safety, adherence and efficacy of exercise training in this population remain unclear. Methods - All randomized, non-randomized and non-controlled trials of exercise training interventions in solid-organ transplant candidates were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess procedural quality. Safety was defined as the number of reported adverse events during exercise training. Adherence was evaluated from session attendance, and efficacy as changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), exercise capacity, muscular strength, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and lung function. Results - Eleven studies involving 874 patients were included: four randomized controlled, one non-randomized controlled and six non-controlled trials. Six studies included heart transplant candidates and five involved patients awaiting lung transplantation. Three trials included aerobic-only training, one incorporated resistance-only exercise and seven combined modalities. Twelve adverse events were reported with four due to exercise, although methods to collect these data were often omitted. Exercise adherence ranged from 82.5–100%, but was poorly described. No significant between–group changes attributable to exercise training were demonstrated. However, significant within-group improvements in CRF, exercise capacity, muscular strength, lung function and HR-QoL were observed. Conclusions - Patients awaiting heart or lung transplant appear to tolerate exercise training despite the larger number of adverse events compared to other high-risk populations. Exercise training demonstrated within-group benefits for several outcomes, with no significant between-group differences. Randomized controlled trials with sufficient statistical power are required for all solid-organ transplant candidates.

Impact and interest:

20 citations in Scopus
11 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

145 since deposited on 06 Nov 2021
63 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 221432
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Pavey, Tobyorcid.org/0000-0002-4946-6683
Measurements or Duration: 9 pages
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.07.004
ISSN: 0955-470X
Pure ID: 33050029
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 06 Nov 2021 15:15
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2024 16:58