Water-recycling in south-east Queensland, Australia: what do men and women think?

& (2008) Water-recycling in south-east Queensland, Australia: what do men and women think? Rural Society, 18(3), pp. 220-229.

[img]
Preview
PDF (181kB)
16994.pdf.

View at publisher

Description

In January 2007, South-East Queensland became the first region in Australia to formally decide to introduce recycled water into the drinking supplies. Internationally, although water recycling occurs in the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore and Belgium, surprisingly little is known about public perceptions. This article explores gender differences in knowledge and acceptance of water recycling as a solution to the water crisis in Australia. A postal survey of Pine Rivers Shire residents showed that both men and women attempted to use water responsibly and had deliberately made changes to reduce their household's water consumption in the past year. All believed that the general community did not have adequate knowledge to vote on water recycling and were supportive of the government's decision to implement it without a referendum. Women were more dubious about the trustworthiness and science of the technology, while men were more knowledgeable and followed the debate more closely. Men were more supportive of building dams and increasing the price of water, whereas women prioritised desalination and greywater. By highlighting the similarities and differences between men and women on the water crisis and water recycling in South-East Queensland, this research will inform the development of risk communication, education and engagement strategies

Impact and interest:

38 citations in Scopus
29 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

116 since deposited on 06 Nov 2021
30 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 224386
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Miller, Evonneorcid.org/0000-0002-0577-3438
Buys, Laurieorcid.org/0000-0001-8917-0863
Measurements or Duration: 10 pages
Keywords: Sustainability, gender differences, knowledge, perception, trust, water recycling
ISSN: 1037-1656
Pure ID: 33604973
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty
Current > Schools > School of Design
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2008 Centre for Rural Social Research
Copyright Statement: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher
Deposited On: 06 Nov 2021 19:28
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2025 19:55