Effects of process-thermal configuration on energy, exergy, and thermo-economic performance of solar driven supercritical water gasification

, , , , , , & (2022) Effects of process-thermal configuration on energy, exergy, and thermo-economic performance of solar driven supercritical water gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 251, Article number: 115002.

Free-to-read version at publisher website

Description

An investigation of the effect of process-thermal configuration on the thermodynamic and economic performance of a solar driven supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of microalgae biomass has been presented in this study. Traditional and intrinsic exergy analysis (transiting and utilizable exergy) of the base SCWG model (Configuration I, four heat exchangers) were used to assess other process-thermal configuration options for optimal performance. Two alternative process configurations (II and III; three and two heat exchangers) were re-produced from the first SCWG configuration and analysed. The two new configurations were modelled by considering the inlet temperature of the water separator units, flow exergy, heat transfer optimization, and point of entry of recycled hot water. The results show that higher SCWG gasification temperature resulted in increased energy efficiency, carbon efficiency, and exergy efficiency with Configuration III having the best performance at 600–610 °C and 1000–1100 °C for optimal gasification and reformer temperature, respectively. While energy efficiency increased with microalgae concentration, exergy efficiency declined due to losses at the heat exchangers, thermodynamic irreversibilities associated with increased char formation and higher system transiting exergy. Lower inlet exergy in the high-temperature separator unit (HT-SEP) resulted in higher transiting (unaccounted) exergy and less utilizable exergy for improved process conversion and overall system efficiency. Increased utilizable exergy was achieved through minimum heat recovery by reducing the number process streams and heat exchangers leading to higher exergy potential for the HT-SEP and minimal process heat duty. The intrinsic exergy efficiencies of the HT-SEP unit, for instance were 58.1%, 72.5% and 82.4% compared to traditional exergy efficiencies at 44%, 23.8%, and 15.1%, for the three configurations, respectively. The best performing SCWG configuration had overall energy efficiency, thermal energy savings, intrinsic exergy efficiency, and carbon efficiency at 81.26%, 56.84 MW, 75.44%, 98.68%. The findings of the exergy assessment in this study establishes intrinsic exergy analysis, as opposed to traditional exergy analysis, as a more realistic assessment and understanding of process efficiency and performance for SCWG processes. Configuration III with a solar PTC-natural gas energy integration resulted in the lowest MFSP (∼49 AUD/GJ) and the closest to the target price for renewable energy-based syngas which emphasizes the benefits of process-energy configuration trade-offs for improved techno-economic performance.

Impact and interest:

7 citations in Scopus
3 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 226746
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Taghipour, Alirezaorcid.org/0000-0001-5076-4154
Will, Geoffreyorcid.org/0000-0003-2488-4325
Chu Van, Thuyorcid.org/0000-0002-4982-0638
Couperthwaite, Saraorcid.org/0000-0002-4296-4153
Steinberg, Tedorcid.org/0000-0002-9270-4130
Rainey, Thomasorcid.org/0000-0001-6910-7883
Additional Information: Funding Information: The first author acknowledges the support of Queensland University of Technology under the Queensland University of Technology Postgraduate Research Award (QUTPRA) scholarship.
Measurements or Duration: 19 pages
Keywords: Aspen Plus, Biomass, Concentrated solar thermal, Configuration, Energy, Exergy, Supercritical water gasification, Thermodynamics
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115002
ISSN: 0196-8904
Pure ID: 102258777
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Materials Science
Current > Research Centres > Centre for a Waste Free World
Current > Research Centres > Centre for Clean Energy Technologies & Practices
Current > Research Centres > Centre for the Environment
?? 1469440 ??
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Science
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering
Current > Schools > School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering
Funding Information: The first author acknowledges the support of Queensland University of Technology under the Queensland University of Technology Postgraduate Research Award (QUTPRA) scholarship.
Copyright Owner: 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 01 Dec 2021 22:25
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2024 04:26