How epistemic reflexivity enables teacher educators' teaching for diversity: exploring a pedagogical framework for critical thinking
Lunn, Joanne, Bourke, Terri, Rowan, Leonie, Ryan, Mary, Churchward, Peter, Walker, Susan, L'Estrange, Lyra, Berge, Anita, & Johansson, Eva (2022) How epistemic reflexivity enables teacher educators' teaching for diversity: exploring a pedagogical framework for critical thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 48(4), pp. 684-703.
|
Published Version
(PDF 1MB)
106451041. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. |
Open access copy at publisher website
Description
Recent research points to the importance of teacher educators teaching for diversity in initial teacher education programs. Teaching for diversity is an approach to teacher education in which an understanding of specialist literature and a focus on critical thinking supports a social justice agenda as opposed to merely using different tips and tricks to prepare future teachers for teaching diverse learners in the classroom. In this study, we explored how Australian and New Zealand teacher educators negotiated a social justice agenda in teacher education programs, using a new transdisciplinary framework of epistemic reflexivity. The Epistemic Reflexivity for Teacher education (ER-TED) framework draws on epistemic cognition (Clark Chinn’s Aims, Ideals, Reliable epistemic processes – AIR- framework) and Margaret Archer’s reflexivity to explore knowledge claims in teacher educators’ pedagogical decision-making. The findings identified how teacher educators in our study discerned and deliberated with respect to epistemic aims for justification, which involve transformative critical thinking and critical thinking for self. They reported good knowledge (Ideals) as being scholarly in nature, and reliable epistemic processes based on higher order thinking (analysis and evaluating competing ideas) or engaging with multiple perspectives. The teacher educators in our study are clear examples of how strong overall evaluative epistemic stances enable teaching for social justice. We argue that the ER-TED framework can help us as a profession to address teaching for diversity in teacher education programs based on the belief that the pursuit of social justice requires an evaluativist epistemic stance.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 228745 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||||||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||||||
ORCID iD: |
|
||||||||||
Additional Information: | Funding Information: This work was funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) DP180100160. Open access publishing facilitated by Queensland University of Technology, as part of the Wiley - Queensland University of Technology agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians. | ||||||||||
Measurements or Duration: | 20 pages | ||||||||||
Keywords: | epistemic reflexivity, social justice, teacher education, teaching for diversity | ||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1002/berj.3789 | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 0141-1926 | ||||||||||
Pure ID: | 106451041 | ||||||||||
Divisions: | Current > Research Centres > Centre for Inclusive Education Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Creative Industries, Education & Social Justice Current > Schools > School of Teacher Education & Leadership Current > Schools > School of Early Childhood & Inclusive Education |
||||||||||
Funding Information: | This work was funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) DP180100160. | ||||||||||
Funding: | |||||||||||
Copyright Owner: | 2022 The Authors | ||||||||||
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||||||||||
Deposited On: | 08 Mar 2022 00:45 | ||||||||||
Last Modified: | 06 Mar 2025 20:17 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page