Evaluation of a closed loop blood sampling system in intensive care: A pilot randomised controlled trial. The enclose trial

, , , Gracie, Christopher, Ilushin, Vladislav, , Parker, Suzanne, , , & (2022) Evaluation of a closed loop blood sampling system in intensive care: A pilot randomised controlled trial. The enclose trial. Australian Critical Care, 35(Supplement 1), S1-S2.

[img]
Preview
PDF (80kB)
106862244 - Abstract.

View at publisher

Description

Introduction: Management of critically ill patients involves extensive diagnostic testing and procedures to inform clinical decision making. This is commonly facilitated by an arterial catheter (AC) connected to a pressurised administration set that maintains patency and facilitates continuous monitoring. Blood sampling is enabled via this system but can result in blood wastage and contamination.

Objectives: To test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of a closed-loop blood sampling system and conservation bundle.

Methods: Single site, parallel group, pilot RCT comparing open system sampling (OS) to closed system sampling (CS) and conservation bundle aligned with national guidelines. Participants were ≥18 years who had AC inserted in intensive care. Randomisation was generated by statistician and then via opaque envelopes. Key outcomes included trial feasibility, blood sample loss, haematocrit (HCT) change, and transfusion (PRBC) use.

Results: 80 patients were randomised (n=39 OS group, n=41 CS group). Characteristics in each group were equal at baseline with overall mean age 60 years [SD 48.6-70.4], 58% male, and mean APACHE score 16 [SD 11-22]. The proportion of patients eligible was 29% and missed eligible 65%. Otherwise, feasibility criteria met with proportion of eligible patients agreeing to enrolment 99%, 100% of patients receiving allocated treatment and only 1% data missing. Analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in daily blood sample losses (OS 32.7(SD 1.58) mLs vs CS 15.5(SD 5.79) mLs, t=8.454, df=78, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in HCT levels. Daily PRBC use was less in the CS group (5%) vs 11% in OS group, though not significantly different.

Conclusions: A large, multi-site trial is feasible with enhanced eligibility criteria, increased recruitment support, and using a cluster design. The intervention reduced daily blood sample volumes and PRBC use. A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial is planned to confirm above findings.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

107 since deposited on 23 Mar 2022
44 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 228975
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Meeting Abstract)
Refereed: No
ORCID iD:
Keogh, Samanthaorcid.org/0000-0002-2797-4388
Huygens, Flaviaorcid.org/0000-0002-2737-2264
Coyer, Fionaorcid.org/0000-0002-8467-0081
Measurements or Duration: 2 pages
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.08.015
ISSN: 1036-7314
Pure ID: 116175484
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Healthcare Transformation
Current > Research Centres > Centre for Immunology and Infection Control
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Biomedical Sciences
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 23 Mar 2022 02:27
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2024 20:09