An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study
Woolaston, Katie, Nay, Zoe, Baker, Michelle L, Brockett, Callum, Bruce, Mieghan, Degeling, Chris, Gilbert, Joshua, Jackson, Bethany, Johnson, Hope, Peel, Alison, Sahibzada, Murdoch, Oskam, Charlotte, & Hewitt, Murdoch (2022) An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study. Globalization and Health, 18(1), Article number: 73.
|
Published Version
(PDF 1MB)
109822994. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. |
Open access copy at publisher website
Description
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has
resulted in significant global impact. However, COVID-19 is just one of several high-impact infectious diseases that emerged from wildlife and are linked to the human relationship with nature. The rate of emergence of new zoonoses (diseases of animal origin) is increasing, driven by human-induced environmental changes that threaten biodiversity on a global scale. This increase is directly linked to environmental drivers including biodiversity loss, climate change and unsustainable resource extraction. Australia is a biodiversity hotspot and is subject to sustained and significant environmental change, increasing the risk of it being a location for pandemic origin. Moreover, the global integration of markets means that consumption trends in Australia contributes to the risk of disease spill-over in our regional neighbours in Asia-Pacific, and beyond. Despite the clear causal link between anthropogenic pressures on the
environment and increasing pandemic risks, Australia’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, like most of the world, has centred largely on public health strategies, with a clear focus on reactive management. Yet, the span of expertise and evidence relevant to the governance of pandemic risk management is much wider than public health and epidemiology. It involves animal/wildlife health, biosecurity, conservation sciences, social sciences, behavioural psychology, law, policy and economic analyses to name just a few.
The authors are a team of multidisciplinary practitioners and researchers who have worked together to analyse, synthesise, and harmonise the links between pandemic risk management approaches and issues in different disciplines to provide a holistic overview of current practice, and conclude the need for reform in Australia. We discuss the adoption of a comprehensive and interdisciplinary ‘One Health’ approach to pandemic risk management in Australia. A key goal of the One Health approach is to be proactive in countering threats of emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses through a recognition of the interdependence between human, animal, and environmental health. Developing ways to implement a One Health approach to pandemic prevention would not only reduce the risk of future pandemics emerging in or entering Australia, but also provide a model for prevention strategies around the world.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 230692 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||
ORCID iD: |
|
||||
Additional Information: | The workshops and writing of this paper was funded by the Queensland University of Technology (including the Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor of Research, the Centre for the Environment, and the Centre for Justice). Publication of this paper is funded by the Murdoch University Biosecurity and One Health Research Centre. | ||||
Measurements or Duration: | 12 pages | ||||
DOI: | 10.1186/s12992-022-00850-4 | ||||
ISSN: | 1744-8603 | ||||
Pure ID: | 109822994 | ||||
Divisions: | Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research Current > Research Centres > Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy Current > Research Centres > Centre for Justice Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law Current > Schools > School of Law Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Science Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Creative Industries, Education & Social Justice |
||||
Funding Information: | KW has received funding from the Australian Federal Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, CLH, MB, BJ, SS, and CO have received funding from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and CD has received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, on matters concerned with the topic of this paper. JG receives funding from the Food Agility Cooperative Research Centre. The workshops and writing of this paper was funded by the Queensland University of Technology (including the Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor of Research, the Centre for the Environment, and the Centre for Justice). Publication of this paper is funded by the Murdoch University Biosecurity and One Health Research Centre. The authors would like to thank Craig Salt, of Sustainable Consulting for facilitating discussions, and the QUT Centre for the Environment and Centre for Justice for additional funding and support. The authors would also like to acknowledge the wonderful contributions from all other workshop participants. | ||||
Copyright Owner: | The Author(s) 2022 | ||||
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||||
Deposited On: | 13 May 2022 00:19 | ||||
Last Modified: | 06 Aug 2025 05:38 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page