Don't just do something, stand there! The value and art of deliberate clinical inertia

Keijzers, Gerben, , Egerton-Warburton, Diana, & Fatovich, Daniel M. (2018) Don't just do something, stand there! The value and art of deliberate clinical inertia. EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 30(2), pp. 273-278.

View at publisher

Description

It can be difficult to avoid unnecessary investigations and treatments, which are a form of low-value care. Yet every intervention in medicine has potential harms, which may outweigh the potential benefits. Deliberate clinical inertia is the art of doing nothing as a positive response. This paper provides suggestions on how to incorporate deliberate clinical inertia into our daily clinical practice, and gives an overview of current initiatives such as ‘Choosing Wisely’ and the ‘Right Care Alliance’. The decision to ‘do nothing’ can be complex due to competing factors, and barriers to implementation are highlighted. Several strategies to promote deliberate clinical inertia are outlined, with an emphasis on shared decision-making. Preventing medical harm must become one of the pillars of modern health care and the art of not intervening, that is, deliberate clinical inertia, can be a novel patient-centred quality indicator to promote harm reduction.

Impact and interest:

19 citations in Scopus
19 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 231151
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
Measurements or Duration: 6 pages
Keywords: Bayesian, clinical judgement, low-value care, overdiagnosis, shared decision-making
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12922
ISSN: 1742-6731
Pure ID: 110249953
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Copyright Owner: 2018 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 20 May 2022 00:18
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2024 21:44