Neurological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of the First 6 Months of Pandemic Reporting

Huth, Samuel F., Cho, Sung Min, Robba, Chiara, Highton, David, Battaglini, Denise, Bellapart, Judith, , , Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Arora, Rakesh C., Whitman, Glenn, , & Fanning, Jonathon P. (2021) Neurological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of the First 6 Months of Pandemic Reporting. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, Article number: 664599.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 967kB)
fneur-12-664599.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

Background: There is growing evidence that SARS-Cov-2 infection is associated with severe neurological complications. Understanding the nature and prevalence of these neurologic manifestations is essential for identifying higher-risk patients and projecting demand for ongoing resource utilisation. This review and meta-analysis report the neurologic manifestations identified in hospitalised COVID-19 patients and provide a preliminary estimate of disease prevalence. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched for studies reporting the occurrence of neurological complications in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Results: A total of 2,207 unique entries were identified and screened, among which 14 cohort studies and 53 case reports were included, reporting on a total of 8,577 patients. Central nervous system manifestations included ischemic stroke (n = 226), delirium (n = 79), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH, n = 57), meningoencephalitis (n = 13), seizures (n = 3), and acute demyelinating encephalitis (n = 2). Peripheral nervous system manifestations included Guillain-Barrè Syndrome (n = 21) and other peripheral neuropathies (n = 3). The pooled period prevalence of ischemic stroke from identified studies was 1.3% [95%CI: 0.9–1.8%, 102/7,715] in all hospitalised COVID-19 patients, and 2.8% [95%CI: 1.0–4.6%, 9/318] among COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU. The pooled prevalence of ICH was estimated at 0.4% [95%CI: 0–0.8%, 6/1,006]. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic exerts a substantial neurologic burden which may have residual effects on patients and healthcare systems for years. Low quality evidence impedes the ability to accurately predict the magnitude of this burden. Robust studies with standardised screening and case definitions are required to improve understanding of this disease and optimise treatment of individuals at higher risk for neurologic sequelae.

Impact and interest:

16 citations in Scopus
9 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

30 since deposited on 01 Jun 2022
19 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 231883
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Review article)
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: Funding Information: Am J Epidemiol. (2001) 153:610–4. doi: 10.1093/aje/153. 6.610 59. Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, Lant S, Michael BD, Easton A, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. (2020) 19:767–83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30 221-0 Conflict of Interest: The authors are all members of the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium Neurology sub-committee. RA has received an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Canada Inc. and honoraria from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceutical, Abbott Nutrition and Edwards Lifesciences that are. GW received funding from the Data Safety Monitoring board of Cytosorbent and Cellphire. GLB receives grant support from University of Queensland, Wesley Medical Research, The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation, The Health Research Board of Ireland, Biomedicine International Training Research Program for Excellent Clinician-Scientists, European Union’s Research and Innovation Program (Horizon 2020), and La Caixa Foundation. GLB and JFF have received research support from Fisher & Paykel. Funding Information: The authors would like to thanks: (1) Chris Parker, Manager of Library Services at The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, who optimised the search strategy and created a de-duplicated endnote library and (2) the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium for providing logistical support, a platform, and an impetus that facilitated the review. Funding. Article Processing Charge funded by The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation. Funding Information: Article Processing Charge funded by The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation.
Measurements or Duration: 12 pages
Keywords: COVID-19, critical care, intensive care, neurological complication, neurological injury
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.664599
ISSN: 1664-2295
Pure ID: 110765592
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering
Current > Schools > School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering
Funding Information: Am J Epidemiol. (2001) 153:610–4. doi: 10.1093/aje/153. 6.610 59. Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, Lant S, Michael BD, Easton A, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. (2020) 19:767–83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30 221-0 Conflict of Interest: The authors are all members of the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium Neurology sub-committee. RA has received an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Canada Inc. and honoraria from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceutical, Abbott Nutrition and Edwards Lifesciences that are. GW received funding from the Data Safety Monitoring board of Cytosorbent and Cellphire. GLB receives grant support from University of Queensland, Wesley Medical Research, The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation, The Health Research Board of Ireland, Biomedicine International Training Research Program for Excellent Clinician-Scientists, European Union’s Research and Innovation Program (Horizon 2020), and La Caixa Foundation. GLB and JFF have received research support from Fisher & Paykel. The authors would like to thanks: (1) Chris Parker, Manager of Library Services at The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, who optimised the search strategy and created a de-duplicated endnote library and (2) the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium for providing logistical support, a platform, and an impetus that facilitated the review. Funding. Article Processing Charge funded by The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation. Article Processing Charge funded by The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation.
Copyright Owner: © Copyright © 2021 Huth, Cho, Robba, Highton, Battaglini, Bellapart, Suen, Li Bassi, Taccone, Arora, Whitman, Fraser and Fanning.
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 01 Jun 2022 02:51
Last Modified: 16 Jul 2024 19:15