Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering

Dinoro, Jeremy N., , , Yue, Zhilian, Lewis, Philip M., Thompson, Robert G., Beirne, Stephen, , & Wallace, Gordon G. (2022) Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers, 14(12), Article number: 2336.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 6MB)
112958960.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques into the medical space has revo-lutionised tissue engineering. Depending upon the tissue type, specific AM approaches are capable of closely matching the physical and biological tissue attributes, to guide tissue regeneration. For hard tissue such as bone, powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques have significant potential, as they are capable of fabricating materials that can match the mechanical requirements necessary to maintain bone functionality and support regeneration. This review focuses on the PBF techniques that utilize laser sintering for creating scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. Optimal scaffold requirements are explained, ranging from material biocompatibility and bioactivity, to generating specific architectures to recapitulate the porosity, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties of native human bone. The main objective of the review is to outline the most common materials processed using PBF in the context of BTE; initially outlining the most common polymers, including polyamide, polycaprolactone, polyethylene, and polyetheretherketone. Subsequent sections investigate the use of metals and ceramics in similar systems for BTE applications. The last section explores how composite materials can be used. Within each material section, the benefits and shortcomings are outlined, including their mechanical and biological performance, as well as associated printing parameters. The framework provided can be applied to the development of new, novel materials or laser-based approaches to ultimately generate bone tissue analogues or for guiding bone regeneration.

Impact and interest:

16 citations in Scopus
2 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

46 since deposited on 21 Jul 2022
30 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 233849
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Review article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Paxton, Naomi C.orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-4764
Woodruff, Maria A.orcid.org/0000-0002-4909-5288
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the support of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF) Materials Node for their provision of equipment and materials, funding support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence Scheme (CE140100012). The support at the Translational Research Initiative for Cell Engineering and Printing (TRICEP) facilities. J.N. Dinoro and N.C. Paxton acknowledge the support of ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing and industry partner, Anatomics Pty Ltd.
Measurements or Duration: 29 pages
Keywords: 3D printing, additive manufacturing, bone regeneration, implants, polymers, sintering
DOI: 10.3390/polym14122336
ISSN: 2073-4360
Pure ID: 112958960
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Biomedical Technologies
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering
Current > Schools > School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering
Funding Information: Funding: The authors acknowledge the support of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF) Materials Node for their provision of equipment and materials, funding support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence Scheme (CE140100012). The support at the Translational Research Initiative for Cell Engineering and Printing (TRICEP) facilities. J.N. Dinoro and N.C. Paxton acknowledge the support of ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing and industry partner, Anatomics Pty Ltd. The authors acknowledge the support of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF) Materials Node for their provision of equipment and materials, funding support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence Scheme (CE140100012). The support at the Translational Research Initiative for Cell Engineering and Printing (TRICEP) facilities. J.N. Dinoro and N.C. Paxton acknowledge the support of ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing and industry partner, Anatomics Pty Ltd.
Copyright Owner: 2022 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 21 Jul 2022 00:48
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2024 21:06