Fruit Fly Larval Survival in Picked and Unpicked Tomato Fruit of Differing Ripeness and Associated Gene Expression Patterns

, , , , & (2022) Fruit Fly Larval Survival in Picked and Unpicked Tomato Fruit of Differing Ripeness and Associated Gene Expression Patterns. Insects, 13(5), Article number: 451.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 1MB)
113391616.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

The larvae of frugivorous tephritid fruit flies feed within fruit and are global pests of horticulture. With the reduced use of pesticides, alternative control methods are needed, of which fruit resistance is one. In the current study, we explicitly tested for phenotypic evidence of induced fruit defences by running concurrent larval survival experiments with fruit on or off the plant, assuming that defence induction would be stopped or reduced by fruit picking. This was accompanied by RT-qPCR analysis of fruit defence and insect detoxification gene expression. Our fruit treatments were picking status (unpicked vs. picked) and ripening stage (colour break vs. fully ripe), our fruit fly was the polyphagous Bactrocera tryoni, and larval survival was assessed through destructive fruit sampling at 48 and 120 h, respectively. The gene expression study targeted larval and fruit tissue samples collected at 48 h and 120 h from picked and unpicked colour-break fruit. At 120 h in colour-break fruit, larval survival was significantly higher in the picked versus unpicked fruit. The gene expression patterns in larval and plant tissue were not affected by picking status, but many putative plant defence and insect detoxification genes were upregulated across the treatments. The larval survival results strongly infer an induced defence mechanism in colour-break tomato fruit that is stronger/faster in unpicked fruits; however, the gene expression patterns failed to provide the same clear-cut treatment effect. The lack of conformity between these results could be related to expression changes in unsampled candidate genes, or due to critical changes in gene expression that occurred during the unsampled periods.

Impact and interest:

2 citations in Scopus
1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

38 since deposited on 01 Aug 2022
30 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 234186
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Clarke, Anthony R.orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-3032
van der Burg, Chloé A.orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-5935
Prentis, Peter J.orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-8875
Additional Information: Funding: The research, including a stipend to S.R., was supported through the Centre for Fruit Fly Biosecurity Innovation, funded through the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Project (DP180101915) and Industrial Transformation Training Centre Program (ARC ITTC) (IC50100026). The funding agency played no role in the design of the experiment or interpretation of data.
Measurements or Duration: 22 pages
Keywords: detoxification genes, frugivorous larvae, fruit fly, fruit picking status, induced defence, Tephritidae
DOI: 10.3390/insects13050451
ISSN: 2075-4450
Pure ID: 113391616
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Science
Current > Schools > School of Biology & Environmental Science
Funding Information: Funding: The research, including a stipend to S.R., was supported through the Centre for Fruit Fly Biosecurity Innovation, funded through the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Project (DP180101915) and Industrial Transformation Training Centre Program (ARC ITTC) (IC50100026). The funding agency played no role in the design of the experiment or interpretation of data.
Funding:
Copyright Owner: 2022 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 01 Aug 2022 00:04
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2024 08:25