A cross-sectional study of the first two years of mandatory training for doctors participating in voluntary assisted dying

, , , , , & (2022) A cross-sectional study of the first two years of mandatory training for doctors participating in voluntary assisted dying. Palliative and Supportive Care.

View at publisher

Description

Objectives: Voluntary assisted dying was legalised in Victoria, Australia in June 2019. Victoria was the first jurisdiction in the world to require doctors to undertake training before providing voluntary assisted dying. This study examines data from doctors who completed the mandatory training in the first two years of the voluntary assisted dying system’s operation (up to 30 June 2021). It describes the doctors who are undertaking VAD training, their post-training attitudes towards VAD participation, and their experiences of the mandatory training.
Methods: Through the online training, doctors completed a short demographic survey and undertook formal assessment of knowledge (90% pass mark). They also were invited to complete an optional survey evaluating the training.
Results: 289 doctors passed the training, most commonly males (56%) aged 36-65 years (82%) from an urban location (72%). Most were more than 10 years post fellowship (68%) and practising as general practitioners (51%) or medical oncologists (16%).
The training most commonly took 6 hours (range 2 – over 9 hours). Most doctors passed the assessment at the first (65%) or second (19%) attempt. Almost all participants (97%) found the training helpful or very helpful and most reported being confident or very confident in their knowledge (93%) and application (88%) of the VAD legislation.
Significance of results: Doctors reported the training was helpful and improved their confidence in knowing the law and applying it in clinical practice. The profile of trained doctors (particularly their location and specialty) suggests continued growth of participating doctors is needed to facilitate patient access to VAD. It is important that this safeguard does not discourage doctors’ participation.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

67 since deposited on 01 Aug 2022
38 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 234202
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Willmott, Lindyorcid.org/0000-0002-9750-287X
Feeney, Rachelorcid.org/0000-0002-8306-1030
Yates, Patsyorcid.org/0000-0001-8946-8504
White, Benorcid.org/0000-0003-3365-939X
Measurements or Duration: 7 pages
Keywords: voluntary assisted dying, law, cross-sectional study, end-of-life decision-making, medical education, voluntary euthanasia
DOI: 10.1017/S1478951522000931
ISSN: 1478-9515
Pure ID: 113429811
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > Research Centres > Centre for Healthcare Transformation
Current > Research Centres > Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Copyright Owner: The Author(s), 2022
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 01 Aug 2022 01:34
Last Modified: 03 Mar 2024 07:55