International Survey of the Usage of Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Software

, , , & (2022) International Survey of the Usage of Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Software. Buildings, 12(8), Article number: 1278.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 2MB)
115158985.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

The pressure to reduce the environmental impacts of buildings over their lifetime has driven certification bodies and the government to require a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, LCA is a data-intensive and time-consuming process which complicates design activities, especially when performing a Whole Building LCA (WBLCA). Software tools can simplify the assessment by providing information more aligned with the users’ needs. This research surveyed 178 building designers who utilise WBLCA software as a decision-making tool. The aim was to identify patterns in the usage of the software and provide guidance to WBLCA software developers. For this purpose, statistical analyses identified the software preferences within each group of users, e.g., the users’ geographical location, professional background and years of WBLCA experience, among others. The results identified challenges faced by the construction industry, such as the need for more efficient communication among stakeholders. Therefore, attributes that allow designers to share information were rated as the most valuable. Two main groups of users were identified, and guidelines were drawn based on the profiles of the groups. Improving software support to designers will enable WBLCA to be integrated more efficiently with BPP by improving the users’ experience and their ability to make more informed decisions.

Impact and interest:

2 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

27 since deposited on 07 Sep 2022
14 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 235119
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Drogemuller, Robinorcid.org/0000-0001-5746-8980
Omrani, Saraorcid.org/0000-0001-7651-1286
Lamari, Fionaorcid.org/0000-0003-4267-0267
Measurements or Duration: 26 pages
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12081278
ISSN: 2075-5309
Pure ID: 115158985
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering
Current > Schools > School of Architecture & Built Environment
Copyright Owner: 2022 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 07 Sep 2022 02:59
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2024 17:13