Transition from brown to green: Analyst optimism, investor discount, and Paris Agreement

& (2022) Transition from brown to green: Analyst optimism, investor discount, and Paris Agreement. Energy Economics, 116, Article number: 106391.

View at publisher

Description

This paper studies financial analysts' evaluation of brown (fossil fuel) versus green (renewable) energy stocks. We find that, compared to green energy stocks, analysts tend to issue more Buy and fewer Sell recommendations for brown energy stocks. Such optimism for brown energy stocks is reduced after the commencement of groundwork for the Paris Agreement. This is especially so for coal stocks than for oil and gas stocks. We also find that, compared to recommendations on green energy stocks, those on brown energy stocks receive a lower reaction from investors, suggesting an investor discount on the informativeness of analyst recommendations on brown energy stocks. Further analysis indicates that in recent years such informational discount has diminished and investors' reliance on analysts' opinions about brown and green energy stocks has converged. Our paper discusses possible reasons for the observed differences and changes in evaluating brown vis-à-vis green energy stocks.

Impact and interest:

4 citations in Scopus
2 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 236570
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Zhang, Xiqianorcid.org/0000-0001-8548-294X
Measurements or Duration: 11 pages
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106391
ISSN: 0140-9883
Pure ID: 118123262
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law
Current > Schools > School of Economics & Finance
Copyright Owner: 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 29 Nov 2022 04:20
Last Modified: 20 Jun 2024 17:05