Implications of Poverty, Inequalities and Trade Liberalization for Access to Health Technologies: An Evaluation of India’s Legislative Response
|
PDF
(794kB)
127817750. |
Description
The Global Wealth Report 2016 stated that India is the second most unequal country in income inequality parameters. In January 2017, Oxfam’s annual policy brief pointed out that 1% of Indians own 58% of total wealth in the country. It is estimated that 57 individuals in India have the same amount of wealth as the bottom 70% of the population. This gross inequality in wealth is arguably a contributing factor to widespread poverty in India. According to the World Bank report ‘Poverty and Shared Prosperity’, India accounts for the largest number of people living below the international poverty line, with 224 million people living under $1.90 a day. In this context, this paper seeks to address the following main issues: What are the implications of poverty and gross inequalities (in wealth and income) for access to health technologies in India? What is the impact of neoliberal globalization and trade liberalization on access to health technologies in India? What is India’s response (in terms of intellectual property law and policy) to address public health challenges caused by the socio-economic issue of poverty/ income inequality and neoliberal globalization? To what extent India’s legislative and policy measures are likely to achieve their desired objectives? What can other developing countries learn from India in relation to their anti-poverty efforts and pro-people legislative and policy measures?
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 238784 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to conference (Paper/Presentation) | ||
Refereed: | No | ||
ORCID iD: |
|
||
Additional URLs: | |||
Pure ID: | 127817750 | ||
Divisions: | Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law Current > Schools > School of Law |
||
Copyright Owner: | Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters | ||
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||
Deposited On: | 22 Mar 2023 05:19 | ||
Last Modified: | 03 Mar 2024 11:36 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page