What contributes to drug driving? An exploratory investigation into the influence of problematic substance use, roadside testing and alternative transport options

, , , & (2023) What contributes to drug driving? An exploratory investigation into the influence of problematic substance use, roadside testing and alternative transport options. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 184, Article number: 106990.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

Despite a strong reliance on enforcement approaches to prevent drug driving in Australia, this behaviour is still prevalent. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of problematic drug use (i.e., showing indications of addiction), exposure to roadside drug testing, the use of detection avoidance strategies, and perceptions relating to alternative transport options on drug driving among illicit drug users. A total of 1,541 licensed drivers from the states of Queensland, New South Wales, and Victoria completed an online survey. The survey collected demographic and problematic substance use information, as well as items assessing drug driving behaviour. Cannabis was reported to be the most commonly used drug (36.0%); the most common drug of problematic use (27.9%), and the drug most often taken prior to driving (43.5%). Observing police operating Roadside Drug Tests (RDT) was more common among the participants than being tested by RDT (35.7% vs 23%). The results indicated a significant association between being a drug driver and observing or being tested by RDT. The drug drivers were significantly more likely to report using a range of strategies to avoid police detection than the non-drug drivers. Similarly, the drug drivers reported that it was more difficult for them to use various alternative transport options than the non-drug drivers. Decision tree analyses found that significant predictors of self-reported drug driving were problematic drug use, holding a provisional or probationary licence, earning a low- or middle-income, and using detection avoidance strategies like remaining watchful for police vehicles and taking back streets. The findings of this study suggest that ongoing improvements to drug driving enforcement will need to be complemented by health-based approaches designed to reduce drug abuse and dependence, and improvements to public transport, in order to achieve a sustainable reduction in drug driving.

Impact and interest:

4 citations in Scopus
1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 240116
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Hasan, Raziorcid.org/0000-0002-4953-4447
Watson, Barryorcid.org/0000-0001-5383-2300
Haworth, Narelleorcid.org/0000-0003-2514-787X
Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscarorcid.org/0000-0001-5916-3996
Additional Information: Funding Information: Funding for a PhD scholarship supporting the first author was provided by NRMA-ACT Road Safety Trust. Dr Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios received salary funding from an Australia Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (DE200101079). All the co-authors received support from the Motor Accident Insurance Commission (MAIC) Queensland. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the funders.
Measurements or Duration: 19 pages
Keywords: Alternative transport, Avoidance strategies, Drug driving, Problematic substance use, Random breath testing, Roadside drug testing
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.106990
ISSN: 0001-4575
Pure ID: 133311553
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Future Mobility/CARRSQ
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling
Funding Information: Funding for a PhD scholarship supporting the first author was provided by NRMA-ACT Road Safety Trust. Dr Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios received salary funding from an Australia Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (DE200101079). All the co-authors received support from the Motor Accident Insurance Commission (MAIC) Queensland. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the funders.
Copyright Owner: 2023 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 05 Jun 2023 05:05
Last Modified: 28 Jun 2024 16:50