Disruptive docs: Teaching hybrid documentary filmmaking in Australia
Open access copy at publisher website
Description
As a documentary educator and practitioner in Australia, ‘truth’ is an area of concern for both my students and I in undertaking the risky capturing and the representation of the lives of others. Documentaries are deceptively difficult to make, especially for the novice, and most especially when considering hybrid non-fiction genre forms. The questions my students pose often centre on how much can they blend reality in the ‘post truth’ moment, and what are the practical and ethical challenges of doing so? This paper urges teachers and makers alike to refer to established documentarians who investigate at truthful depictions that often transcend the didactic recitation of facts. Citing the examples of Conjuring the Rolling Thunder Revue: A Bob Dylan Story (directed by Martin Scorsese, 2019) and The Rehearsal (created by and starring Nathan Fielder, 2022), I present a pragmatic discussion as to how disruptive non-fiction form a pure triadic relationship between participants, audiences, and filmmakers, which necessarily involves the overlap of ethics and creativity. I refer to a recent student hybrid documentary film Bustard Head (directed by Lucy Lakshman, 2021) as an example outcome of this pedagogically oriented approach.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
ID Code: | 241086 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||
Refereed: | Yes | ||
ORCID iD: |
|
||
Measurements or Duration: | 13 pages | ||
Keywords: | Documentary studies, filmmakers, narrative analysis, film analysis, creative practice, archival practices, genre studies, disruption, ethics | ||
DOI: | 10.1080/17503175.2023.2224616 | ||
ISSN: | 1750-3175 | ||
Pure ID: | 138852059 | ||
Divisions: | Current > Research Centres > Centre for Justice Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Creative Industries, Education & Social Justice |
||
Funding Information: | I would like to thank Sue Cake, Glenda Hambly, Anna Dzenis, Sean Maher, and Felicity Collins for their comments on this paper, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. | ||
Copyright Owner: | 2023 The Authors | ||
Copyright Statement: | <br/> | ||
Deposited On: | 04 Jul 2023 01:10 | ||
Last Modified: | 05 Aug 2024 00:38 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page