Real-driving CO2, NOx and fuel consumption estimation using machine learning approaches

, , , , , , , & (2023) Real-driving CO2, NOx and fuel consumption estimation using machine learning approaches. Next Energy, 1(4), Article number: 100060.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

Real driving emissions (RDE) testing are gaining attention for monitoring and regulatory purposes because of providing more realistic emission and fuel consumption measurements compared to laboratory tests. This study aims to develop machine learning (ML) based emission and fuel consumption estimation models using real- driving measurement data. A light-duty diesel vehicle equipped with a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) was driven in an urban test route by 30 participant drivers of disparate backgrounds to obtain a wide variety of data in terms of driving behaviour and traffic conditions. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to select the input variables among 36 driving behaviours and 6 engine parameters. The CO2, NOx and fuel consumption prediction models were developed using linear regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR). The results showed that all three models could predict CO2 with an absolute relative error (ARE) of less than 9%. The GPR model showed the best performance in CO2 prediction with an R2 of 0.74 and ARE of 3.30%. LR model showed the best prediction accuracy for NOx with an R2 of 0.80 and ARE of 8.91%. All three models worked well for fuel consumption prediction, however, GPR showed the best accuracy with an R2 of 0.81 and ARE of 3.52%. This method lays a foundation for developing route/region specific emission and fuel consumption models that will help to monitor and reduce the environmental impact and the amount of burned fuel. Moreover, developing models from different driver classes will provide valuable insights into emission-optimal driving behaviour which could be used to train new drivers.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 246385
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Komol, Md Mostafizur Rahmanorcid.org/0000-0001-9746-8109
Chu-Van, Thuyorcid.org/0000-0002-4982-0638
Ristovski, Zoranorcid.org/0000-0001-6066-6638
Brown, Richard j.orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-4862
Measurements or Duration: 9 pages
DOI: 10.1016/j.nxener.2023.100060
ISSN: 2949-821X
Pure ID: 157457206
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Science
Current > Schools > School of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering
Current > Schools > School of Electrical Engineering & Robotics
Current > Schools > School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering
Copyright Owner: 2023 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 23 Feb 2024 07:16
Last Modified: 02 Aug 2024 02:06