India's Use of Patent Opposition Mechanism as an Access to Drugs Strategy: An Empirical Analysis
Abbas, Muhammad Zaheer (2024) India's Use of Patent Opposition Mechanism as an Access to Drugs Strategy: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 29(4), pp. 253-264.
|
Submitted Version
(PDF 973kB)
173041699. |
Free-to-read version at publisher website
Description
Global public health has emerged as a formidable challenge in modern times. India‘s patent opposition model shows how this legitimate safeguard can be used to alleviatesome of the burden on global health systems by improving access to affordable health technologies. India smartly linked its patentability threshold provisions, Sections 3(d) and 2(ja) of The Patents Act, 1970 (amended in 2005), with its procedural safeguard of patent opposition.This paper presents empirical data on the use of patent opposition procedures in India. The three-step method is adopted to statistically evaluate the practical use of India‘s patent opposition proceedings.Statistical data is collected on 249 patent opposition cases from IP India‘s official websiteto answer and analyse around 150 questions designed to highlight overall trends in the use of the Indian patent opposition mechanism. This paper summarizes the important findings of the statistical data. The main finding of this study is that India‘s well-thought-out patent opposition model has remained under-utilised, especially by non-corporate entities.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
| ID Code: | 250560 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||
| Refereed: | Yes | ||
| ORCID iD: |
|
||
| Measurements or Duration: | 12 pages | ||
| Keywords: | Access to medicines, India, patent opposition, public health, section 3(d), TRIPS flexibilities. | ||
| DOI: | 10.56042/jipr.v29i4.3704 | ||
| ISSN: | 0971-7544 | ||
| Pure ID: | 173041699 | ||
| Divisions: | Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law Current > Schools > School of Law |
||
| Copyright Owner: | Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters | ||
| Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||
| Deposited On: | 12 Jul 2024 02:43 | ||
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 18:42 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page