Medicolegal consequences of doctors accepting bequests and gifts under a patient’s will

, , , & (2025) Medicolegal consequences of doctors accepting bequests and gifts under a patient’s will. Medical Journal of Australia.

View at publisher

Description

Doctors accepting testamentary gifts from patients’ wills need to be mindful of complying with their overlapping legal, professional and ethical obligations to patients. The cases of Schwanke v Alexakis; Camilleri v Alexakis (Schwanke) and Health Care Complaints Commission v Alexakis (HCCC) demonstrate that although a testamentary gift to a doctor may be upheld, the doctor may nevertheless face disciplinary action.

Dr Alexakis (Alexakis), a general practitioner, received a house and 90% of the remainder of an about $27 million estate under his patient’s will, who died in 2017 aged 84 years. In Schwanke, it was alleged that Alexakis unduly influenced his patient (who had been discharged home after hospitalisation for serious ongoing conditions) so he could become the main beneficiary. In 2024, after lengthy legal proceedings, they were unsubstantiated. The will was upheld and Alexakis kept the testamentary gift.

HCCC focused on allegations by the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission that Alexakis breached professional boundaries in his treatment and management of the patient, which ultimately resulted in testamentary gifts. The Tribunal accepted the Commission’s submission that, at a minimum, Alexakis demonstrated a “wholesale ignorance” of ethical issues concerning the risk of undue influence.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 260735
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Kroesche, Nicoleorcid.org/0009-0009-4348-3149
Cockburn, Tinaorcid.org/0000-0002-4685-8075
Purser, Kellyorcid.org/0000-0002-8350-6351
Sullivan, Karenorcid.org/0000-0002-5952-5114
Measurements or Duration: 3 pages
Keywords: medicolegal ethics, Undue Influence, Testamentary Gifts and Bequests, professional ethics
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.70077
ISSN: 0025-729X
Pure ID: 207877119
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling
Copyright Owner: © 2025 AMPCo Pty Ltd.
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 16 Oct 2025 03:40
Last Modified: 16 Oct 2025 23:13