Stakeholder perspectives regarding the mandatory notification of Australian data breaches

, , , & von Nessen, Paul (2010) Stakeholder perspectives regarding the mandatory notification of Australian data breaches. Media and Arts Law Review, 15(2), pp. 149-168.

[img]
Preview
Accepted Version (PDF 17kB)
COVERSHEET2_-__37694.pdf.

View at publisher

Description

The advent of data breach notification laws in the United States (US) has unearthed a significant problem involving the mismanagement of personal information by a range of public and private sector organisations. At present, there is currently no statutory obligation under Australian law requiring public or private sector organisations to report a data breach of personal information to law enforcement agencies or affected persons. However, following a comprehensive review of Australian privacy law, the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) has recommended the introduction of a mandatory data breach notification scheme. The issue of data breach notification has ignited fierce debate amongst stakeholders, especially larger private sector entities. The purpose of this article is to document the perspectives of key industry and government representatives to identify their standpoints regarding an appropriate regulatory approach to data breach notification in Australia.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

112 since deposited on 05 Oct 2010
5 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 37694
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Burdon, Markorcid.org/0000-0001-9802-4366
Miller, Evonneorcid.org/0000-0002-0577-3438
Measurements or Duration: 20 pages
ISSN: 1325-1570
Pure ID: 32209632
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Law
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty
Past > Institutes > Information Security Institute
Current > Schools > School of Law
Current > Schools > School of Design
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2010 LexisNexis
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 05 Oct 2010 01:21
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2024 06:39