Looking for Answers to Mediation's Neutrality Dilemma in Therapeutic Jurisprudence

Douglas, Kathy & Field, Rachael M. (2006) Looking for Answers to Mediation's Neutrality Dilemma in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. eLaw Journal, 13(2), pp. 177-201.


The notion of neutrality has long been criticised in the mediation literature. It is often said that mediator neutrality is a myth that hides the reality of the impact of the mediator on both the content and the process of mediation. Despite these criticisms neutrality continues to be seen as central to mediation theory and to the acceptance of mediation as a legitimate, fair and just process. Internationally, new models of mediation are being developed that reject the concept of the neutral mediator. These models base their claim to fairness and legitimacy on being therapeutic in nature, valuing relationships highly, and including a multidisciplinary approach to understanding conflict and emotion. In this article we discuss the paradigm of therapeutic jurisprudence and its links with new models of mediation, such as the story-telling, transformative and narrative models. We argue that therapeutic jurisprudence can provide a legitimate foundation for mediation without reliance on the concept of neutrality.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

1,477 since deposited on 04 Oct 2007
318 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 6288
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional URLs:
ISSN: 1321-8247
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2006 Murdoch University School of Law and (The authors)
Copyright Statement: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher
Deposited On: 04 Oct 2007 00:00
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2012 13:18

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page