Grant v Commissioner of Patents — the introduction of a physicality requirement into Australian patent law

McEniery, Benjamin J. (2006) Grant v Commissioner of Patents — the introduction of a physicality requirement into Australian patent law. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 12(8), N−193-N−194.

[img] PDF (78kB)
Administrators only

Abstract

The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has for the first time considered the patentability of a pure business method, being one that does not incorporate a physical device, in Grant v Commissioner of Patents.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 6497
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: No
Additional Information: For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (link above) or contact the author b.mceniery@qut.edu.au
Additional URLs:
Keywords: Patents, Patentability, Patentable Subject Matter, Physicality, Physical Aspect, Grant, Grant v Commissioner of Patents
ISSN: 1357-3128
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2007 Benjamin McEniery
Deposited On: 13 Mar 2007 00:00
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2010 12:38

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page