As good as cash? The diminution of the autonomy principle

Dixon, William M. (2004) As good as cash? The diminution of the autonomy principle. Australian Business Law Review, 32(6), pp. 391-406.


The recent decision of Austin J in Boral Formwork v Action Makers highlights significant statutory inroads into the autonomy principle, as it applies to bank guarantees and unconditional performance bonds. To explore whether these instruments should continue to be accepted in lieu of cash retentions, this paper examines the autonomy principle and its exceptions (both common law and statutory). The conclusion reached is that the uncertain, and potentially broadening, operation of both the common law and statutory exceptions to the autonomy principle may significantly curtail the use of bank guarantees and unconditional performance bonds as cash equivalents. For a bank guarantee or unconditional performance bond to function as a risk allocation device (as well as a security), an intended beneficiary will need to routinely implement certain safeguards. Placing blind faith in the autonomy principle will no longer suffice.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

5,569 since deposited on 16 Mar 2007
496 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 6547
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher: This journal is available online - use hypertext link..
Additional URLs:
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Commercial and Contract Law (180105)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2004 Thomson Legal & Regulatory
Deposited On: 16 Mar 2007 00:00
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2012 13:06

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page