The Arab Spring and its social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks

, , & (2014) The Arab Spring and its social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks. In McCaughey, M (Ed.) Cyberactivism on the participatory web. Routledge, United States of America, pp. 86-116.

View at publisher

Description

The “Arab Spring” uprisings in 2011 saw widespread anti-government protests, and some régime changes, in many Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries, from Libya and Tunisia to Bahrain and Syria. Social media were among the tools used by protesters to organize themselves and to disseminate footage from rallies. These were not only used by local activists, but also attracted comments from a worldwide media audience, for example in Twitter hashtag conversations such as #egypt and #libya. These hashtags were used to mediate a wide range of practices of political participation among a diverse group of social media users-from distanced observation and information-sharing in a globalized “ambient journalism” 1 environment through to narration of direct experience and even coordination of on-the-ground activities. However, there is no reason to assume that these diverse activities were really “connected” via the hashtag, or that one geographically or culturally distinct group of users ever encountered another, hence highlighting the question of whether social media, in such contexts, facilitates the flow of information across social boundaries. This chapter addresses these questions via an analysis of language differences in social media communication focused on the Arab Spring and in doing so describes new methods for the analysis of large-scale Twitter data.

Impact and interest:

0 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

52 since deposited on 15 May 2014
38 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 71626
Item Type: Chapter in Book, Report or Conference volume (Chapter)
ORCID iD:
Bruns, Axelorcid.org/0000-0002-3943-133X
Highfield, Timorcid.org/0000-0002-1794-146X
Burgess, Jeanorcid.org/0000-0002-4770-1627
Measurements or Duration: 31 pages
DOI: 10.4324/9781315885797
ISBN: 978-0-415-70903-3
Pure ID: 32632967
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty
Past > Research Centres > ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation
Past > Research Centres > Centre for Emergency & Disaster Management
Funding:
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2014 Taylor & Francis
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 15 May 2014 00:40
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2024 19:53