Evaluation in Use: The Practitioner View of Effective Evaluation

While the academic literature has paid much attention to public relations evaluation over past decade (Baskin, Aronoff & Lattimore, 1997; Cutlip, Center & Broom, 2006; Dozier Repper, 1992; Walker, 1994; Watson, 2001), many studies have suggested practitioner use evaluation methods remains limited (Gregory,2001; Macnamara, 2002; Pieczka, 2000; Pohl & Vandeventer, 2001; Walker, 1994; Watson, 1997). Although practitioners use both formal and informal methods to evaluate their effectiveness (Walker, 1994; Watson, 2001), unclear how their reporting of public relations success measures up to actual achievement organisational outcomes. This study of approximately 70 practitioners builds on four major Australian studies evaluation use (Macnamara, 2002; Walker,1994; Watson & Simmons, 2004; Xavier, Patel & Johnston, 2004) to identify the evaluation patterns of public relations practitioners including the major focus of their evaluation efforts, the use of evaluation to demonstrate organisational outcomes and the barriers further evaluation. Utilising the trends identified by the four studies, a set of initiatives proposed to encourage practitioners to extend their evaluation activities and thereby support their claims to enhanced performance.