GATES: An online step-wise blackboard tool to develop student collaborative teamwork competencies

& (2018) GATES: An online step-wise blackboard tool to develop student collaborative teamwork competencies. In 12th International Lifelong Learning in Pharmacy (LLLP 2018), 2018-07-06 - 2018-07-09. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF (325kB)
__qut.edu.au_documents_StaffHome_StaffGroups$_singletj_Documents_Conference Presentations_Lifelong Learning in Pharmacy_2018_Oral Presentation_Singleton_Kenyon_GATES_Abstract.pdf.
[img]
Preview
PDF (954kB)
__qut.edu.au_documents_StaffHome_StaffGroups$_singletj_Documents_Conference Presentations_Lifelong Learning in Pharmacy_2018_Oral Presentation_Singleton_Kenyon_GATES.pdf.

Description

Background Interdisciplinary collaboration and communication are vital health graduate capabilities required for future professional pathways. However, students report problems with domineering team members, ‘hitchhikers’, non-cohesive strategies and divergent views,1,2 leading to de-motivation, conflict and poor learning outcomes.3,4 An online Blackboard tool incorporating five strategic ‘gates’ (Team structure, Communication, Leadership, Situation monitoring, and Mutual support was designed to support the social processes required for team cohesion in students doing group assessments. Objectives To determine if the GATES 2.0 tool supported student group work collaborations and improved the group work experience. Methodology GATES was embedded in the Blackboard sites of six QUT health units (courses) which had a group assessment task in 2017. Participants comprised six academics and 721 students. Data collection involved the completion of two online surveys – at the beginning and end of the semester. Both demographic and qualitative data were collected. Results Students believed the tool improved group communication, organisation, and time management through development of action plans. However, GATES did not help resolve conflicts in a few groups, particularly those dealing with ‘hitchhikers’ and members producing poor quality work. Academics reported little need for facilitation of student groups and three reported less student emails regarding group issues. Discussion: There was evidence to support the use of the tool, however more resources need to be added to help students deal with group conflict. The tool would be more effective if the unit coordinators incorporated its use in tutorial activities so that it is not seen simply as an extra activity.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

53 since deposited on 18 Jul 2018
7 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 119887
Item Type: Contribution to conference (Paper/Presentation)
Refereed: No
ORCID iD:
Singleton, Judith A.orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-6391
Kenyon, Johanna J.orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-6105
Keywords: Blackboard tool, Group assessment, Group work, Student learning outcomes, Student support, Teamwork, Teamwork competencies
Pure ID: 57314086
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Clinical Sciences
Current > Schools > School of Biomedical Sciences
Copyright Owner: 2018 the Author(s)
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 18 Jul 2018 03:08
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2024 08:39