Making it tangible: hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews
Conrad, Lettie Y. & Tucker, Virginia (2019) Making it tangible: hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), pp. 397-416.
|
Accepted Version
(PDF 703kB)
33442396. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. |
Description
Purpose Qualitative researchers and information practitioners often investigate questions that probe the underlying mental models, nuanced perspectives, emotions and experiences of their target populations. The in-depth qualitative interview is a dominant method for such investigations and the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how incorporating hybrid card-sorting activities into interviews can enable deeper participant reflections and generate rich data sets to increase understanding.Design/methodology/approach Following a review of relevant literature, the case illustration presented is a grounded theory study into the student-researcher information experience with personal academic information management. This study uses hybrid card sorting within in-depth, semi-structured interviews, a unique adaptation that extends multi-disciplinary awareness of the benefits of card-sort exercises for qualitative research.Findings Emerging from diverse fields, ranging from computer science, engineering, psychology and human–computer interaction, card sorting seeks to illuminate how participants understand and organise concepts. The case illustration draws largely on methods used in interaction design and information architecture. Using either open or fixed designs, or hybrid variations, card-sort activities can make abstract concepts more tangible for participants, offering investigators a new approach to interview questions with the aid of this interactive, object-based technique.Originality/value Opening with a comprehensive review of card-sort studies, the authors present an information experience case illustration that demonstrates the rich data generated by hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews, or interactive interviews. This is followed by discussion of the types of research questions that may benefit from this original method.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
| ID Code: | 123885 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||
| Refereed: | Yes | ||
| ORCID iD: |
|
||
| Measurements or Duration: | 20 pages | ||
| Keywords: | Card sorting, Information experience, Information research methods, Information user research, Qualitative research methods, Semi-structured interviews | ||
| DOI: | 10.1108/JD-06-2018-0091 | ||
| ISSN: | 0022-0418 | ||
| Pure ID: | 33442396 | ||
| Divisions: | Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty | ||
| Funding Information: | The authors are grateful to information architecture and user experience experts for bringing the card-sort method to researchers like the authors. The authors also thank the San Jos? Gateway PhD community, in particular Drs Mary Somerville and Guy Gable, for inspiration, feedback, and suggestions that helped to shape this paper. Ethics clearance and permission to use participants? anonymised interview data are in accordance with QUT Low Risk Research Approval #1600000992. | ||
| Copyright Owner: | 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited | ||
| Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||
| Deposited On: | 19 Dec 2018 08:47 | ||
| Last Modified: | 22 Jun 2026 19:41 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page