Correcting tool or learning tool? Student perceptions of an online essay writing support tool at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

Reis, Charlie & (2016) Correcting tool or learning tool? Student perceptions of an online essay writing support tool at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. In Pardo, A, Dawson, S, Colvin, C, & Bazrker, S (Eds.) Show me the learning: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2016: 33rd International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education - ASCILITE, Australia, pp. 529-533.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 525kB)
ascilite2016_reis_concise.pdf.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.

View at publisher

Description

This paper reports on the initial data from an extension project that intends to further develop Marking Mate, a self-directed assignment writing support programme developed at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU) by Eoin Jordan and Andy Snyder. The study explores how students currently use the programme and how they would like to see it being improved. In this paper, we explore the apparent tension between students wanting to use Marking Mate as a correction tool and its potential as a learning tool, with reference to the specific Chinese context of the university. An additional tension between a highly contextualised and locally developed programme (such as Marking Mate), and widely available online tools that allow for potentially similar outcomes (such as Grammarly), is also discussed. It is argued that the programme may be more effective if it is explicitly presented as a learning tool, rather than a correction tool.

Impact and interest:

4 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

188 since deposited on 11 Mar 2019
30 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 127378
Item Type: Chapter in Book, Report or Conference volume (Conference contribution)
ORCID iD:
Huijser, Henkorcid.org/0000-0001-9699-4940
Measurements or Duration: 5 pages
Pure ID: 33001290
Copyright Owner: 2016 The Author(s)
Copyright Statement: The author(s) assign a Creative Commons by attribution licence enabling others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon their work, even commercially, as long as credit is given to the author(s) for the original creation.
Deposited On: 11 Mar 2019 01:25
Last Modified: 10 May 2024 10:38