Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: The extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST)

Kirkpatrick, Andrew W., Sirois, M., , , Rowan, K., , Hameed, S. M., , , Dulchavsky, S. A., , & Nicolaou, S. (2004) Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: The extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST). Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 57(2), pp. 288-295.

View at publisher

Description

Background: Thoracic ultrasound (EFAST) has shown promise in inferring the presence of post-traumatic pneumothoraces (PTXs) and may have a particular value in identifying occult pneumothoraces (OPTXs) missed by the AP supine chest radiograph (CXR). However, the diagnostic utility of hand-held US has not been previously evaluated in this role. Methods: Thoracic US examinations were performed during the initial resuscitation of injured patients at a provincial trauma referral center. A high frequency linear transducer and a 2.4 kg US attached to a video-recorder were used. Real-time EFAST examinations for PTXs were blindly compared with the subsequent results of CXRs, a composite standard (CXR, chest and abdominal CT scans, clinical course, and invasive interventions), and a CT gold standard (CT only). Charts were reviewed for in-hospital outcomes and follow-up. Results: There were 225 eligible patients (207 blunt, 18 penetrating); 17 were excluded from the US examination because of battery failure or a lost probe. Sixty-five (65) PTXs were detected in 52 patients (22% of patients), 41 (63%) being occult to CXR in 33 patients (14.2% whole population, 24.6% of those with a CT). The US and CXR agreed in 186 (89.4%) of patients, EFAST was better in 16 (7.7%), and CXR better in 6 (2.9%). Compared with the composite standard, the sensitivity of EFAST was 58.9% with a likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) of 69.7 and a specificity of 99.1%. Comparing EFAST directly to CXR, by looking at each of 266 lung fields with the benefit of the CT gold standard, the EFAST showed higher sensitivity over CXR (48.8% versus 20.9%). Both exams had a very high specificity (99.6% and 98.7%), and very predictive LR+ (46.7 and 36.3). Conclusion: EFAST has comparable specificity to CXR but is more sensitive for the detection of OPTXs after trauma. Positive EFAST findings should be addressed either clinically or with CT depending on hemodynamic stability. CT should be used if detection of all PTXs is desired.

Impact and interest:

527 citations in Scopus
408 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 226070
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Laupland, K. B.orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-5354
Measurements or Duration: 8 pages
Keywords: Hand-held ultrasound, Occult pneumothorax, Pneumothorax, Resuscitation, Ultrasound
DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000133565.88871.E4
ISSN: 0022-5282
Pure ID: 101417552
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Education
Past > Schools > School of Cultural & Professional Learning
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
?? 16 ??
?? 1605 ??
Current > Schools > School of Early Childhood & Inclusive Education
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Clinical Sciences
Current > Schools > School of Optometry & Vision Science
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Division of Research and Innovation
Copyright Owner: 2004 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 11 Nov 2021 04:12
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2024 15:24